Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Inter-goal conflict and facilitation as predictors of adherence to dieting goals: an ecological momentary assessment study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Author-Supplied Keywords:
      Dieting
      Ecological Momentary Assessment
      goal conflict
      goal facilitation
      snacking
    • Abstract:
      Objectives: To examine dieting goals within a system of individual goals, and the patterns by personally-relevant goals might interfere or facilitate each other. Design: 94 dieters completed an assessment of goals using Little's personal project analysis. Participants identified 7 goals; one of which was pre-defined as adhering to diet. Over the beginning 14 days of their diet, participants completed an Ecological Momentary Assessment study recording their food intake in real-time. Every evening, participants reported their goal engagement and which goals conflicted or facilitated with each other. Main outcome measures/results: Over the study duration, 1452 days of food intake and goal conflict/facilitation were recorded. Participants completed an average of 1.54 (SD = 0.85) snacks, an average of 0.94 (SD = 1.81) goal conflicts, and 4.16 (SD = 4.70) goal facilitations per day. Inter-goal conflict was associated with a significant but small improvement on individuals' mood, but was not associated with daily dietary intake or long-term weight-loss. Similarly, inter-goal facilitation was not associated with daily dietary intake or long-term weight-loss. Daily food intake was a significant predictor of long-term weight-loss. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest the impact of inter-goal conflict and facilitation on dieting is not via overall snack or food consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Psychology & Health is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • Author Affiliations:
      1College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
      2Institute of Public Health and Nursing Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
    • Full Text Word Count:
      8090
    • ISSN:
      0887-0446
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496
    • Accession Number:
      143394834
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      ELLISTON, K. G.; SCHÜZ, B.; FERGUSON, S. G. Inter-goal conflict and facilitation as predictors of adherence to dieting goals: an ecological momentary assessment study. Psychology & Health, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 6, p. 701–717, 2020. DOI 10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=143394834. Acesso em: 20 set. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Elliston KG, Schüz B, Ferguson SG. Inter-goal conflict and facilitation as predictors of adherence to dieting goals: an ecological momentary assessment study. Psychology & Health. 2020;35(6):701-717. doi:10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496
    • APA:
      Elliston, K. G., Schüz, B., & Ferguson, S. G. (2020). Inter-goal conflict and facilitation as predictors of adherence to dieting goals: an ecological momentary assessment study. Psychology & Health, 35(6), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Elliston, Katherine G., Benjamin Schüz, and Stuart G. Ferguson. 2020. “Inter-Goal Conflict and Facilitation as Predictors of Adherence to Dieting Goals: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.” Psychology & Health 35 (6): 701–17. doi:10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496.
    • Harvard:
      Elliston, K. G., Schüz, B. and Ferguson, S. G. (2020) ‘Inter-goal conflict and facilitation as predictors of adherence to dieting goals: an ecological momentary assessment study’, Psychology & Health, 35(6), pp. 701–717. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Elliston, KG, Schüz, B & Ferguson, SG 2020, ‘Inter-goal conflict and facilitation as predictors of adherence to dieting goals: an ecological momentary assessment study’, Psychology & Health, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 701–717, viewed 20 September 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Elliston, Katherine G., et al. “Inter-Goal Conflict and Facilitation as Predictors of Adherence to Dieting Goals: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.” Psychology & Health, vol. 35, no. 6, June 2020, pp. 701–717. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Elliston, Katherine G., Benjamin Schüz, and Stuart G. Ferguson. “Inter-Goal Conflict and Facilitation as Predictors of Adherence to Dieting Goals: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.” Psychology & Health 35, no. 6 (June 2020): 701–17. doi:10.1080/08870446.2019.1684496.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Elliston KG, Schüz B, Ferguson SG. Inter-goal conflict and facilitation as predictors of adherence to dieting goals: an ecological momentary assessment study. Psychology & Health [Internet]. 2020 Jun [cited 2020 Sep 20];35(6):701–17. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=a9h&AN=143394834