Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      BACKGROUND: Infection is a devastating complication of permanent pacemakers (PMs) implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Many implanting physicians commonly use povidone-iodine solution to irrigate the device pocket before implanting the device. We sought to assess if such a measure would alter the rate of infection. METHODS: A total of 2,564 consecutive patients who received implantable PM or ICD devices between 1994 and 2002 were studied. Povidone-iodine was used for pocket irrigation in 53% and saline in 47%. A total of 18 (0.7%) patients developed pocket infections with 0.7% (10/1,359) in povidone-iodine (group I) and 0.6% (8/1,205) in saline (group II) pocket irrigation (p = ns). Groups I and II were studied for various clinical and demographic variables described in the results section. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between groups I and II, respectively. ICDs were most frequently infected than PMs (56% vs 44%). Most (83%) of the devices were dual chamber. Reopening of the pocket for either lead or generator replacement had a higher incidence of infection than new implants (61% vs 39%). There was no difference in the use of preimplantation antibiotic prophylaxis. Late (61%) and deep pocket infections (78%) were more common than early (39%) and superficial infections (22%). Blood cultures were positive in 67% and Staphylococcus aureus was the common most pathogen (50%). The mean duration of antibiotics use after the diagnosis of device infection was 35 +/- 23 days with 72% requiring device explantation. The device was reimplanted on the contralateral side in 56% cases. One patient in each group died due to device infection and related complications. No significant allergy to iodine was seen in either group. CONCLUSION: Povidone-iodine irrigation of the subcutaneous pocket did not alter the rates of pocket infection after pacemaker/defibrillator implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • :
      Copyright of Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
    • ISSN:
      0147-8389
    • DOI:
      10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x
    • Accession Number:
      106389381
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      LAKKIREDDY D et al. The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections. Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 8, p. 789–794, 2005. DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=c9h&AN=106389381. Acesso em: 30 out. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Lakkireddy D, Valasareddi S, Ryschon K, et al. The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections. Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology. 2005;28(8):789-794. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x
    • APA:
      Lakkireddy D, Valasareddi S, Ryschon K, Basarkodu K, Rovang K, Mohiuddin SM, Hee T, Schweikert R, Tchou P, Wilkoff B, Natale A, & Li H. (2005). The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections. Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, 28(8), 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Lakkireddy D, Valasareddi S, Ryschon K, Basarkodu K, Rovang K, Mohiuddin SM, Hee T, et al. 2005. “The Impact of Povidone-Iodine Pocket Irrigation Use on Pacemaker and Defibrillator Infections.” Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology 28 (8): 789–94. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x.
    • Harvard:
      Lakkireddy D et al. (2005) ‘The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections’, Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, 28(8), pp. 789–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x.
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Lakkireddy D, Valasareddi S, Ryschon K, Basarkodu K, Rovang K, Mohiuddin SM, Hee T, Schweikert R, Tchou P, Wilkoff B, Natale A & Li H 2005, ‘The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections’, Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 789–794, viewed 30 October 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Lakkireddy D, et al. “The Impact of Povidone-Iodine Pocket Irrigation Use on Pacemaker and Defibrillator Infections.” Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 28, no. 8, Aug. 2005, pp. 789–794. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Lakkireddy D, Valasareddi S, Ryschon K, Basarkodu K, Rovang K, Mohiuddin SM, Hee T, et al. “The Impact of Povidone-Iodine Pocket Irrigation Use on Pacemaker and Defibrillator Infections.” Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology 28, no. 8 (August 2005): 789–94. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00173.x.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Lakkireddy D, Valasareddi S, Ryschon K, Basarkodu K, Rovang K, Mohiuddin SM, et al. The impact of povidone-iodine pocket irrigation use on pacemaker and defibrillator infections. Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology [Internet]. 2005 Aug [cited 2020 Oct 30];28(8):789–94. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=c9h&AN=106389381