Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Source:
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1998 VO: 42 5 5, 545 (545-550)
  • Additional Information
    • Author(s):
      Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, Moller J, Paaske PB
    • Review Group(s):
      Cochrane Prehospital and Emergency Health Field Trials in the Group's Specialized Register
    • Cochrane Study Design:
      RCT
    • Record Status:
      This record is unmodified this issue.
    • Abstract:
      BACKGROUND: As no clinical randomised studies have previously been performed comparing complications with the Ciaglia Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Introducer Set (PDT) and conventional surgical tracheostomy (TR), we designed a study with the aim of comparing the efficacy and safety of the two techniques. METHODS: Sixty patients selected for elective tracheostomy were randomised for either PDT (30 patients) or TR (30 patients). All patients had general anaesthesia and were ventilated with 100% oxygen. Furthermore, lidocaine with epinephrine 1% (3-5 ml) was used for local analgesia and to minimise bleeding during the procedure. RESULTS: The median time for insertion of the tracheostomy tube was 11.5 min (range 7-24 min) in the PDT group and 15 min (range 5-47 min) in the TR group (P
    • Review Group keywords:
      Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesics [Administration & Dosage]; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Local [Administration & Dosage]; Blood Loss, Surgical [Prevention & Control]; Dilatation; Intubation, Intratracheal [Instrumentation]; Lidocaine [Administration & Dosage]; Middle Aged; Oxygen [Administration & Dosage]; Postoperative Hemorrhage [Etiology]; Respiration, Artificial; Safety; Surgical Procedures, Elective; Surgical Wound Infection [Etiology]; Time Factors; Tracheostomy [Adverse Effects] [Instrumentation] [Methods]; Comparative Study [checkword]; Female [checkword]; Human [checkword]; Male [checkword]
    • Source:
      This document should be cited as: Holdgaard HO Pedersen J Jensen RH Outzen KE Midtgaard T Johansen LV Moller J Paaske PB. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment 1998 VO: 42 (The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR/CENTRAL). Oxford: Update Software. Updated quarterly.
    • Accession Number:
      CN-00583065
  • Citations
    • ABNT:
      HOLDGAARD HO et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 5, p. 545–550, 1998. Disponível em: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cgh&AN=CN-00583065. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2020.
    • AMA:
      Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 1998;5(5):545-550. Accessed November 24, 2020. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cgh&AN=CN-00583065
    • APA:
      Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, Moller J, & Paaske PB. (1998). Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 5(5), 545–550.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Author-Date:
      Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, Moller J, and Paaske PB. 1998. “Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy versus Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy. A Clinical Randomised Study. See Comment.” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 5 (5): 545–50. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cgh&AN=CN-00583065.
    • Harvard:
      Holdgaard HO et al. (1998) ‘Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment’, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 5(5), pp. 545–550. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cgh&AN=CN-00583065 (Accessed: 24 November 2020).
    • Harvard: Australian:
      Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, Moller J & Paaske PB 1998, ‘Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment’, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 545–550, viewed 24 November 2020, .
    • MLA:
      Holdgaard HO, et al. “Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy versus Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy. A Clinical Randomised Study. See Comment.” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 5, no. 5, Jan. 1998, pp. 545–550. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cgh&AN=CN-00583065.
    • Chicago/Turabian: Humanities:
      Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, Moller J, and Paaske PB. “Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy versus Conventional Surgical Tracheostomy. A Clinical Randomised Study. See Comment.” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 5, no. 5 (January 1, 1998): 545–50. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cgh&AN=CN-00583065.
    • Vancouver/ICMJE:
      Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. see comment. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica [Internet]. 1998 Jan 1 [cited 2020 Nov 24];5(5):545–50. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=cgh&AN=CN-00583065